• About Percival Henry

Percival Henry: The Fantastic Four and more

~ Blogging the Fantastic Four issue by issue (plus whatever else grabs my attention)

Percival Henry: The Fantastic Four and more

Tag Archives: movies

Very Short Review: Black Panther (2018)

21 Wednesday Feb 2018

Posted by percivalhenry in Very Short Review

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Black Panther, Chadwick Boseman, entertainment, jack Kirby, Marvel, Michael B. Jordan, movies, Ryan Coogler, show business, Wakanda

For anyone paying attention, yes, it’s been a very long time since I posted on this blog. Sorry.

I was moved to pick it up again after seeing Black Panther, and leaving the multiplex with some thoughts that seemed bigger than just a Facebook post. Warning: there will be spoilers

It’s hard to separate Black Panther, the movie, from Black Panther, the cultural event. Much has rightly been made of its historic significance, a big-budget popcorn movie with a black director and mostly black cast. The New York Times had no less than 10 articles about the movie in the week before its opening, touching on everything from its hair styling decisions, to the appropriateness of white children donning Black Panther masks. When Marvel first announced the movie four years ago, it had no way of knowing it would land at such a fraught moment for race relations in the US, and for the US’s relations with the rest of the world (and particularly with “shit hole” countries). Timing in movie marketing, as in all things, is everything, and Black Panther—a declaration of African American creativity, political significance and, yes, buying power—has arrived just when we needed it most.

Also welcome is the movie’s African-ness, which makes it refreshingly distinct, and it’s one big reason to recommend the movie. Under director Ryan Coogler, fictional Wakanda isn’t merely the backdrop to the story, but virtually a leading character. Every scene reveals a new wonderment, from its interpretation of African tradition, such as T’Challa’s coronation beneath a waterfall festooned with hundreds of his countrymen in traditional attire, to a dizzying plunge into the nation’s African-influenced technological heart. Coogler’s vision of Wakanda is different from that of Jack Kirby’s, its inventor, who drew it as mechanical jungle in 1966, but it’s faithful to the spirit of Kirby’s vivid imagination. Others are more qualified than me to judge how much of its depiction of African culture is authentic and how much is Hollywood pastiche, but its world-building ambition is dazzling.

Black Panther’s challenge is presenting characters and a story to match the wonderment of Wakanda, and unfortunately that’s where it falls short. The plot hinges on the machinations of Killmonger, an exiled prince of Wakanda who returns to usurp the throne, but it takes far too long to build momentum. It’s almost derailed by a detour to Korea, and a pointless melee in a casino (maybe it’s a trend: The Last Jedi had a similarly unnecessary casino scene), before ending with a confusing and  implausible fight scene for the future of a nation that seems to involve only about two dozen combatants. There’s also a distracting and pointless plot point involving a CIA agent, played by Martin Freeman, shooting down cargo planes. Very little seems urgent, and it’s telling that one of the moments of real drama comes when Killmonger orders the burning of a few plants.

Killmonger is at least a compelling villain, with a backstory and motivations more complex and nuanced than those of 99% of comic book bad guys. As played by Michael B. Jordan, he’s easily the most charismatic character on the screen, and that’s a big part of the movie’s problem, because T’Challa, the Black Panther, never is. It’s strange for the protagonist of an action movie to fade into the background, and yet T’Challa never feels essential to his own movie. Part of the issue is the producers’ inclination to turn what should be a solo story into a team movie, and many of the qualities that make Black Panther a great comic book character are farmed off to the supporting cast: Killmonger is more assertive; his sister, Shuri, is more tech savvy; his mother, Ramonda, his more regal, Okoye, his general, is more skilled in battle; M’Baku, a rival king, is more powerful.

Chadwick Boseman plays T’Challa with a soft-spoken grace, but while that works when he’s in suit and tie, it fails him in superhero garb. He’s passive, almost indifferent, and recedes as other actors step forward. The story doesn’t serve him well, either, as it’s a catalog of his humiliations and defeats: He is tongue tied into incompetence around his love interest Nakia; he barely fends off M’baku’s challenge; he fails to capture Klaue on his ill-advised mission to Korea; he foolishly agree to fight Killmonger in ritual combat before he is soundly beaten and left for dead. He then disappears from his own movie, only to be rescued by his M’baku. And in the climactic battle, he is all but irrelevant before finally defeating Killmonger. With that record, it’s no wonder his council of elders challenges his authority at every turn.

It’s a shame T’Challa’s character is so under developed, because Black Panther has so much else going for it. The good news is, as with all superhero blockbusters, there will be a Black Panther sequel, and another chance to spin a story befitting a king.

Very Short Review: Snowpiercer (2013)

30 Saturday Jan 2016

Posted by percivalhenry in Very Short Review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

movies, sci-fi

snowpiercer-movie-poster

I’m late to the cult of Snowpiercer, which had a brief appearance in theaters three years ago, but has had a much longer life in online chat rooms. It’s not hard to see why. Like The Matrix and The Hunger Games, movies with which it shares both aesthetic and thematic qualities, Snowpiercer asks Big Questions while serving up stylish and riveting action. The plot is more metaphor than actual story: in the near future, efforts to halt global warming have plunged the world into a deep freeze. All life is extinct, save the passengers on super train that circles the globe once a year. Like the world of the Hunger Games, society is divided between the haves, who live in decadent luxury at the front of the train; and the have-nots, the grimy rabble packed into the rear of the train, subsisting on a diet of protein Jello. The absurdity of the situation is more or less addressed as the movie unfolds and a band of rebels, led by the reluctant, brooding Chris Evans (surprisingly effective in a non-Captain America role), battles their way car-by-car to the front of the train to seek retribution, or at least redistribution. Despite these narrow confines of story and setting, Snowpiercer succeeds through the vivid, crisp direction of Korea’s Bong Joon Ho, and has enough wrinkles to keep it interesting. The movie’s climax, a confrontation between Everett and the elegant Ed Harris as the train’s creator and engineer, does lurch into some tedious philosophical territory but that’s a failure only of Snowpiercer‘s ambition. The strong cast also features Tilda Swinton as a bizarrely accented enforcer of the social order, and John Hurt as a decrepit Obi Wan Kenobi guiding the rebellion.

Nerdverse: Comics, Race and Casting Superheroes

05 Friday Dec 2014

Posted by percivalhenry in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

comics, movies

Benedict-in-Screen-Magazine-04-2013-benedict-cumberbatch-33870098-1280-15491Strange_Vol_1_5_Textless

Marvel has announced it cast Benedict Cumberbatch to play Dr. Strange in an upcoming movie. I don’t have a problem with it – I would have preferred Clive Owen, but he’s probably past his sell-by date to carry a blockbuster – and Cumberbatch certainly can do arrogant, which is a big part of Strange’s character.

A lot of other people do seem to have a problem with it, at least judging from the comment sections on various fan sites. There are quibbles about Cumberbatch’s acting style and general ubiquity, but the strongest objections are to his being yet another white guy playing the lead in a super hero movie. Here’s a typical comment on the Marvel website:

Ah, yes, because Marvel needed MORE franchises headed by white males.

Another:

wanna see the number of lineups for diversity in the superhero roster in MCU movies? White Men: 9 (Cap, Iron Man, Hulk, Hawkeye, Thor, Peter Quill, Drax (kinda he’s half Filipino), ant-man, now DOCTOR STRANGE) White Women: 2 (Black widow, Captain Marvel) Men of color: 2 Black panther, ??Falcon?? (he IS a superhero in comics but in MCU he hasnt had his own movie OR been inducted into an official superhero group yet) Women of color: 1 (Gamora) Misc: 2 (Groot, Rocket Raccoon) so with the addition of cumberface, 9 male white superhero leads, 2 white women superheroes, 2 black male superheroes, 1 green female superhero (played by a black actress), and 1 animal and 2 tree

(The above isn’t actually accurate, as it omits Nick Fury)

This is fraught territory, and sucks in race, politics, identity, and the history of both comic books and movies. The flap over casting Cumberbatch for Strange adds a new wrinkle in the debate over the  races of actors. It’s not new – I remember controversy over casting the white Jonathan Pryce as a Eurasian pimp in Miss Saigon – but it’s picked up steam in the age of the superhero flick as black actors were cast as white characters (or characters believed to be white). Samuel L. Jackson as Nick Fury, Idris Elba as Heimdall (a Norse God in Thor) and even Amandla Stenberg as Rue in the Hunger Games all provoked storms of mini-outrage. This, however, is the first example I can think of where people are upset by a black actor NOT being cast for a white character.

For those who live outside the nerd bubble, Stephen Strange was an asshole surgeon who lost the use of his hands in a car wreck. Desperate to find a cure, he seeks out the Ancient One, a Tibetan mystic, who teaches him the art of magic, and Strange becomes the Sorcerer Supreme, Earth’s preeminent wizard.

Dr. Strange first appeared in 1963, in a backup story in Strange Tales No. 110, and was created by Stan Lee, who had a hand in almost every Marvel character, and the great artist Steve Ditko, more famous for his work on Spider-Man. Dr. Strange stories were trippy excursions into alternate dimensions and universes, involving ancient artifacts like the Wand of Wattoomb, and epic battles with the Dread Dormammu and Baron Mordo.   STRANGE

Like virtually every character from that era, Strange was white. At least he was drawn as a white man, and while I’m not aware of any explicit discussion of his whiteness, Marvel was not subtle when it came to depicting minorities. If he was intended to be anything other than white, we would have known.

But does he need to be white in the movie? Actually, no. Unlike a number of characters whose racial identity is important to our understanding of them – ie., they come from Africa, they are part of a family of super heroes, they are masters of Kung Fu – Dr. Strange’s ethnicity isn’t tied down. He’s not really from anyplace in particular, and he has few connections to the rest of the world.  It’s not hard to picture a rich black surgeon with the same issues as Stephen Strange (Eriq La Salle played one for years). Casting a non-white actor would change our perception of him, but not the character.

So should Marvel have cast an actor of color? That’s the trickier question. Marvel and DC have gotten better about creating minority characters but there’s no denying that during the Golden and Silver Ages (roughly, from 1938 to 1970) the most prominent superheroes and villains were white, and they remain the tent pole characters for those companies. They didn’t accurately represent America or the world then, and they don’t now. While undoing the 50 or 70 year history of characters in the comics to correct the imbalance is problematic at best (and offensive at worst), one could argue casting the movies offers a chance for a fresh start.

That argument makes more sense if you approach these characters as primarily a movie goer, with little familiarity of the characters. Dr. Strange is, at best, a second tier hero – he didn’t have his own title for years at a time – and it’s a fair bet the general public has no idea who he is. For them, a black Dr. Strange wouldn’t be as challenging as, say, a black Batman. For Dr. Strange fans, though, undoing a key part of the character’s visual identity would be a lot harder to accept. They’ve followed him faithfully since 1963. Now, when he’s finally getting a movie, they’re told a big part of his appearance is being changed to accommodate a movie-going public that has no investment in the character.

Michael+B+Jordan+Premiere+Warner+Bros+Pictures+TP4Lq3J7UB-lsmcs7-1

We will be faced with an extreme version of this problem with the casting of the black Michael J. Jordan as Johnny Storm, the Human Torch, in next year’s Fantastic Four. Unlike Strange, the Human Torch doesn’t exist in isolation. The Fantastic Four is a family. His sister is Susan Storm, the Invisible Woman. Tinkering with their races opens up issues so fundamental to the team that it risks invalidating the whole project (Marvel has experience with this: in the 1978 cartoon, it replaced Johnny with H.E.R.B.I.E the Robot) .

To avoid an all-white cinematic super hero universe, it makes sense to cast actors of colors in roles where the characters are less established, and their racial identity is not critical.  More importantly, Marvel and Warner Brothers (owner of DC) should identify their existing black characters and develop them into the anchors of potential movies. To an extent, that’s happening, with Black Panther and Cyborg movies planned.

The easiest solution, of course, is to ignore race altogether. The comics have dozens of red androids, green aliens and blue-furred mutants eager for their star turn. Let the debate over casting Red Tornado begin.

Very Short Review: Senna (2010)

18 Wednesday Jun 2014

Posted by percivalhenry in Sports, Very Short Review

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

movies, sports

senna

 

We rented this documentary based on the enthusiastic reviews I remembered reading when it came out. I’m a sports fan, but I’ve never been particularly interested in auto racing or Formula 1, and my knowledge of Aryton Senna – the three-time world champion who died in a 1994 crash – was pretty rudimentary. I can confidently say I now know much more about Senna than I did, although I’m not sure the film was otherwise very fulfilling. It’s never boring, but it also never escapes the sports documentary genre in the way that made “Hoop Dreams” or “When We Were Kings” so compelling. “Senna” is told in straight chronological order with no narrator, using tons of racing and interview footage from Senna’s brief, meteoric career. Born to a wealthy Brazilian family, Senna was a phenomenon, racing and winning from a young age with spectacular style. The film is its most riveting as he tears around the tracks in Monte Carlo, Tokyo and Interlagos, Brazil, often from the vantage of a camera perched above his shoulder. As he advanced up the Formula 1 pecking order, Senna won an army of fans and made high-profile enemies, which snarled him in various dramas that played out on video. He was also handsome, charming and articulate in English, which helps the film’s cause of presenting Senna as the sympathetic victim of the corrupt world of auto racing. Cast as the villains are his chief rival, the canny Frenchman, Alain Prost, and the cynical head of the racing association, Jean-Marie Balestre, also a Frenchman, who appear to conspire to confound the brash Senna. We never hear from Prost or Balestre outside the contemporary footage, and this one-sided narrative is the film’s greatest weakness. We gets hints that Senna’s aggressive style meant he was not universally beloved by other drivers, mostly seen in a testy interview with former champion Jackie Stewart, but it’s not enough to dull the hagiographic shine. The film ends with long shots of Senna’s funeral, and interviews with weepy fans, one of which who said with Senna’s death, there would be “no joy” in Brazil. The movie forgets to mention Brazil’s soccer team won the World Cup that year.

 

Very Short Review: Cave of Forgotten Dreams (2010)

17 Saturday May 2014

Posted by percivalhenry in Very Short Review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

movies

caves-of-forgotten-dreams-poster-usa-768x1024

 

“Cave of Forgotten Dreams” crosses Discovery-channel type documentary with philosophizing art house cinema. While not as gripping as his earlier “Grizzly Man,” it is similarly a canvas for German filmmaker and eccentric Werner Herzog’s ruminations about life and death, man and nature. Here, he is given rare access to film the Chauvet cave in France, rediscovered in 1994 after being completely sealed off by a landslide for 30,000 years. The natural formations of the cavern are spectacular but the real star is the paintings of prehistoric mammals, rendered with amazing vitality and sophistication. Long sections of the movie are devoted to simply filming the art in changing light. Herzog doesn’t dwell on the motivations of the painters,  declaring them unknowable, and instead focuses on the abyss of time between us and them. In one section of the cave, carbon dating reveals two similar paintings were completed almost 5,000 years apart, a seeming instant for the artists but an incomprehensible gulf for us. The movie was filmed in 3D, to better capture the art on the cave’s undulations and ridges, and while it still worked in the conventional 2D, I wish I had seen it in its intended format. Herzog closes with an odd, whimsical coda about mutant albino crocodiles invading the cave, which didn’t make much sense but reminds us the film isn’t journalism but a personal vision, and he’s showing us the world as he sees it.

Very Short Review: Man of Steel

11 Tuesday Feb 2014

Posted by percivalhenry in Uncategorized, Very Short Review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

movies

Image

As a longtime collector of comic books, I’m pre-disposed to like super hero movies. This one was a challenge. A retelling of Superman’s origin from Zack Snyder (300, Watchmen), Man of Steel is big, bulky and disjointed, with key points of the story told through distracting flashbacks. A long opening chunk of the movie is set on Krypton, where Superman’s father Jor-El (played by Russell Crowe) has been re-imagined as an action hero, flying a winged beast through a collapsing city and battling the evil General Zod over the future of their dying race. In this telling, young Kal-El becomes a symbol of Jor-El’s hope for the species, and Zod vows to hunt him down. If you accept superhero stories are a form of American mythology, there should be room for new interpretations and you can’t get too hung up on any one version being correct. The problem with this approach, though, is that Jor-El never recedes into the background (he reappears after his death as a sort of helpful ghost who engineers plot points) and Superman becomes a pawn in his own story. Structurally, the plot – which ties Superman’s origin to the climactic battle with Zod  – obscures the development of much else we associate with the Superman, so we never see Clark Kent at the Daily Planet, his youth is told in flashbacks, and Lois Lane (played with style by Amy Adams) is crammed awkwardly into the narrative. The movie is all first and third acts. Man of Steel also suffers from a gloom that feels borrowed from the last Star Trek movie, and particularly, the Dark Knight trilogy. In the comics, there’s the idea that Gotham City is New York south of 14th St., and Metropolis is the city north of 14th. That tonal difference should be reflected in the characters and their stories. Here, the clouds rarely part and when Superman plays earnest and sincere – asking a skeptical humanity to trust him – he comes across as a naive simpleton.

Very Short Review: Frances Ha

07 Friday Feb 2014

Posted by percivalhenry in Very Short Review

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

movies

Image

Saw this on DVD the other night. It was fun and breezy, with enough uncomfortable moments to make it interesting. And I liked the idea of a female loser, which is rare in movies. But star Greta Gerwig seemed too old for the role of an aspiring young dancer, and the whole project, shot in black and white, had the feel of a film student’s first feature, financed with credit cards, not the work of a veteran (Noah Baumbach) with dozens of titles under his belt.

Is Wolverine on Steroids?

07 Friday Feb 2014

Posted by percivalhenry in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

comics, movies

The thought occurred to me after watching The Wolverine the other night with my wife that Hugh Jackman probably took steroids for that role. The guy is a 45-year-old actor and he looks like this:

Image

He may be a fitness fanatic, but I suspect to get in shape, and stay in shape, he’s aided by chemistry. And so long as he’s taking them under the supervision of a doctor, that’s fine. Steroids are used in a medical context all the time. We only get bent out of shape about them in sports, when we feel they are being used to create an unfair advantage. (Some people argue that the full legalization of steroids in sports would recreate a level playing field. It might, but it would also distort comparisons with athletes from the past.) We also don’t like it when kids take them, because of health concerns. I have no ethical issue with an actor taking steroids to prepare for a role; there’s no competition at stake here, besides with the egos of other 40-something males, and no party is injured.

But should steroids only be for actors? If they can be taken safely and legally, should others in professions that rely on strength – and where the artificial rules of competition are not enforced – be taking them? Do we want our fireman and soldiers to be as strong as possible, to fulfill their missions? Probably. How about sanitation workers? Would a regimen of safe steroids enhance garbage collection?

And that took me back to Wolverine. In the fictional comic book universe, would super heroes with only normal human strength be on steroids? If you accept the premise that their heroics are protecting lives and saving the world , then shouldn’t they maximize their strength by any (safe) means possible? Maybe some characters would shun them on moral grounds, but even Captain America, that pillar of rectitude, was created by  vita-rays, a 1940s version of steroids. I’m guessing characters like Batman and Wolverine, who look for every other advantage, would quite naturally be on the juice.

  • “The World’s Greatest Comic Magazine!” Fantastic Four Annual No. 15
  • “The World’s Greatest Comic Magazine!” Fantastic Four No. 223
  • “The World’s Greatest Comic Magazine!” Fantastic Four No. 222
  • “The World’s Greatest Comic Magazine!” Fantastic Four No. 221
  • “The World’s Greatest Comic Magazine!” Fantastic Four No. 220
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • September 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • February 2018
  • May 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • September 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • February 2018
  • May 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
“The World’s Greatest Comic Magazine!” Fantastic Four Annual No. 15

“The World’s Greatest Comic Magazine!” Fantastic Four Annual No. 15

percivalhenry's avatar by percivalhenry July 18, 2026
“The World’s Greatest Comic Magazine!” Fantastic Four No. 223

“The World’s Greatest Comic Magazine!” Fantastic Four No. 223

percivalhenry's avatar by percivalhenry July 14, 2026
“The World’s Greatest Comic Magazine!” Fantastic Four No. 222

“The World’s Greatest Comic Magazine!” Fantastic Four No. 222

percivalhenry's avatar by percivalhenry July 5, 2026
“The World’s Greatest Comic Magazine!” Fantastic Four No. 221

“The World’s Greatest Comic Magazine!” Fantastic Four No. 221

percivalhenry's avatar by percivalhenry June 25, 2026
“The World’s Greatest Comic Magazine!” Fantastic Four No. 220

“The World’s Greatest Comic Magazine!” Fantastic Four No. 220

percivalhenry's avatar by percivalhenry June 15, 2026
“The World’s Greatest Comic Magazine!” Fantastic Four No. 219

“The World’s Greatest Comic Magazine!” Fantastic Four No. 219

percivalhenry's avatar by percivalhenry June 7, 2026

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Percival Henry: The Fantastic Four and more
    • Join 74 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Percival Henry: The Fantastic Four and more
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
Loading Comments...